The Rabbit Hole

Why is “science” demonizing science?

Happy Earth Day Ya’ll! It’s no coincidence that Earth Day is on Lenin’s birthday, or maybe it is. Certainly promoters of Earth Day will say that the connection is just silly. Right wing conspiracy making lunacy from logic. That doesn’t change the fact that it’s purpose is completely aligned with communism.

Let’s not forget the obvious intentions of the UN toward global equality and it’s connections to use environmental policy as one way to shape that goal. But lets take a closer look at the techniques used to promote their policies. Take this quote for example from UNESCO, the UN’s educational, scientific and cultural division,

“…taking the techniques of persuasion and information and true propaganda that we have learnt to apply nationally in war, and deliberately bending them to the international tasks of peace, if necessary utilizing them — as Lenin envisaged – to ‘overcome the resistance of millions‘ to desirable change.

The past several years have brought about an intensity in the campaign to employ soviet type propaganda tactics to marginalize and demonize anyone who dares to question to current mainstream narrative of so-called “science”. A platform has been created for political ideas that has been lumped together with the overall idea of empirical scientific advancement in order to solidify it as unconditional truth. This platform includes a broad scope of evolutionary ideas and origins, climate change caused by human behavior, the safety of vaccines, GMO’s, and other environmental issues.

These political issues share a common global perspective in the larger agenda for population control, redistribution of the wealth, and the elimination of societal institutions like religion and the family structure, that are blamed for national allegiance and the prevention of globalism.

Today marks yet another clichéd demonstration called “The March For Science”.  People are outraged that in this day and age, some have the audacity to question so-called proven science. Things like global warming, whoops, I mean climate change, and evolution are the issues. The rhetoric is that a few ignorant, unscientific, illiterate, rogues are challenging of the scientific method used to prove empirical data. They are accused of intellectual destruction and leading masses of poor children back to the abuses of the medieval dark ages.

I was always under the impression that “science”  meant asking questions? More specifically,

sci·ence ˈ sīəns/

So, since when is questioning the status quo unscientific? Neil Degrasse Tyson is a spokesperson along with Bill Nye the Science Guy, (not actually a scientist), for the “March For Science”. They have put forth a vitriolic campaign, likening the decline of the American way of life to the questioning of “established” science. Videos are being widely circulated online working to marginalize anyone who drifts from the global agenda.

How established is the science we are talking about? More importantly, how trustworthy are the scientists who are establishing these facts?

Should we not consider the possibility of corruption of facts for a bigger agenda? Why is big brother telling us the way to scientific progress is asking questions on one hand, but we dare not question on the other? It seems more like statist propaganda to me. Lets not forget 1984’s, “2+2=5”. What is truth? What the state says it is.

So what about the truth of established mainstream science? We are always hearing that these facts have been proven by the empirical method and we might as well believe in unicorns if we try to call this into question.

Methods used to formulate this data is suspect though. In these articles by MIT graduate and meteorologist Charlie Clough, we see that sometimes neglecting to disclose the full data leads to corruption through omission. http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/charles-clough/climate-change-theorists-consistently-deceive-glaring-omission

http://barbwire.com/2015/12/02/7-reasons-to-oppose-any-agreement-from-the-paris-climate-summit/

If we take a deeper look we can see the bigger agenda. It really has nothing to do with “science”. In fact, using science as an omnipotent entity is a logical fallacy. “Science says” and other similar terminology are used to manipulate us into thinking there is some sort of determinate quality that is encompassed in the authoritative term, “science”.  The truth is science is an array of fluid and changing data. What may have been controversial before is mainstream today. While the scientific method is indeed a reliable source for empiricism, there is a great deal of personal interpretation involved when it comes to the issues being debated. Climate data is limited to just over 100 years of recorded history. It’s preposterous to attempt to take such a fragmented period of data and make factual claims about what will happen in the future, and how much can be attributed to humans. In the same regard, evolution is not observable.

There is also reason to believe that political agendas and fraudulent behavior carry a heavy influence over published data. https://jaysanalysis.com/2015/08/14/the-age-of-transition-and-scientism-fraud/ . And that individual agendas are also in play, https://jaysanalysis.com/2014/06/10/philosophy-phoenix-arises-to-annihilate-degrasse-tyson/ .

Of course there is also the more blatant agenda that doesn’t even attempt to hide its intentions, like the article below mentions from earlier this year that global warming was created as a motive to change the global economy. https://thenationalsentinel.com/2017/02/03/un-official-actually-admits-that-global-warming-is-a-scam-designed-to-change-worlds-economic-model/un declares purpose for climate change redistribution of wealth

Tyson and others are claiming that science is what made America great, and that having a president and vice president that challenge the status quo, is leading our country into a state of regression. Personally, I believe this is a contradiction. Science is all about challenging the status quo to discover new frontiers. So I guess it’s time we get it straight, (for our democracy and all) and pledge allegiance to the phantom named “science”, that contrary to its definition, demands that it’s predetermined truth must be left to the experts, and everyone else needs to blindly follow in line. Best to leave the science to the scientists son.